# 3.0 Schema review questions remaining

**URL:** <https://forum.openreferral.org/t/3-0-schema-review-questions-remaining/274>\
**Category:** Technical\
**Created:** [November 10, 2022, 12:47pm UTC](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/3-0-schema-review-questions-remaining/274 "2022-11-10T12:47:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![skyleryoung](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.openreferral.org/skyleryoung/32/212_2.png) [@skyleryoung](https://forum.openreferral.org/u/skyleryoung)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2022, 7:26pm UTC](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/3-0-schema-review-questions-remaining/274/4 "2022-11-16T19:26:42Z")

</div>

Devin’s points reflect my own assumptions and opinions as well. To emphasize a few key points:

1. In general, I’m in favor of deprecation over deletion.
2. I confirm that `location_type` exists primarily to delineate virtual locations.
3. I think adding `required_document.uri` is a good idea. Heuristically, I’m in favor of simply calling it “uri” as that naming convention already exists. However, it’s not a major issue either way.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/3-0-schema-review-questions-remaining/274)._