# Standing Technical Meetups

**URL:** <https://forum.openreferral.org/t/standing-technical-meetups/454>\
**Category:** Technical\
**Created:** [November 6, 2023, 10:39am UTC](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/standing-technical-meetups/454 "2023-11-06T10:39:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 55

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dan-ODS](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/forum.openreferral.org/dan-ods/32/89_2.png) [@Dan-ODS](https://forum.openreferral.org/u/Dan-ODS)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2025, 2:33pm UTC](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/standing-technical-meetups/454/55 "2025-02-03T14:33:12Z")

</div>

Hi all,

Please see the proposed agenda for meeting next Wednesday.

There a few things we’d appreciate people look at prior to the meeting if possible (see emboldened).

Agenda:

- UK update

* * *

- [Validator features](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tszuthH-_xq1vmjOQbUsroGf8R-wScFu6bYhEs9h4eI/edit?gid=482058597#gid=482058597)

* * *

- [Transformer](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/hsds-go-types-and-constructors/597) proposal – **is this of interest? What questions do people have?**

* * *

- [Adding meta data API](https://github.com/openreferral/specification/issues/524)
  - **[Please review the proposal drafted by KI](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jy1wOShCNypl7OqAIuMTc80blxTBUn5_6YhjvOyF6LI/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.ye0dggmm63xe) combining MT and KL’s suggestions**

  - Related [forum thread](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/extra-metadata-with-api-feeds/572/5)for reference

* * *

- ‘related standards’
  - Add Marc 21 – **Please review KI’s[suggested a way forward](https://github.com/openreferral/specification/issues/200)ready for discussion / decision**

* * *

- [When a data standard/specification is used for a given field, provide a way to define _which_ standard was used. #286](https://github.com/openreferral/specification/issues/286)
  - SY has moved discussion to[the forum](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/when-a-data-standard-specificaion-is-used-for-a-given-field-provide-a-way-to-define-which-standard-was-used/598)
  - ODS have closed the issue

* * *

- Recent forum threads (for reference):
  - [What might a stricter version of the standard look like?](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/what-might-a-stricter-version-of-the-standard-look-like/599/4) – **can we reformulate?**
  - [Demo of taxonomy/terminology alignment tool](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/demo-of-taxonomy-terminology-alignment-tool/604)
  - [International Community of Social Referral Tools](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/international-community-of-social-referral-tools/588)
  - [SustainOSS forum on open source sustainability](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/sustainoss-forum-on-open-source-sustainability/602)
  - [Resource Data Federation: let’s discuss](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/resource-data-federation-lets-discuss/601)
  - [Data transformation toolkit](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/data-transformation-toolkit/586)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.openreferral.org/t/standing-technical-meetups/454)._