Thanks so much for the summary, Dan.
One more link to remind folks: the remaining field-level issues in the schema are being discussed here. Seems like we’re close to consensus.
We’ll try to reach agreement on this on Monday’s workgroup call. Input is encouraged before then. (Although Monday’s decision will be provisional in advance of a formal proposal which will still be subject to comment and revision – so it won’t technically be the last chance for these questions to be considered. But sooner we identify concerns and/or alternatives, the better!)