Hi all,
Hope you’re well.
Here is the proposed agenda for next Wednesdays meeting:
Agenda:
-
Revising Open Referral Community Survey
- Collective review of Open Referral Tools ongoing – see Forum thread
- Separate meeting proposed for this. Do we need it or can we do it here?
- See specific Question regarding API richness checker
-
Reviewing HSDS Governance proposals:
- Organizational: Proposed “working group” governance model
- Technical: Upgrades, updates and versioning (branch for review)
-
Reviewing [Technical Task and Priorities Github Project Board](Technical Tasks and Priorities · GitHub)
- Backlog (44 issues) includes tasks that:
- We don’t think are a priority over the next 6-12 months
- Are not in high demand within the community (as far as we’re aware).
- Proposed (19 issues) includes tasks that:
- We think are a priority over the next 6-12 months
- Are in demand within the community
- Are quick, straightforward and relevant enough to just get done.
- Of course, these are soft proposals to give the technical community something that is easy to engage with.
- What next? work towards agreement on 3.1 MINOR upgrade. Agreed issues can then be allocated to 3.1 milestone.
- We can follow the process laid out in the Proposed Revision Process #draft (discussed above)
- Backlog (44 issues) includes tasks that:
-
Update on the schedule table issue
- Issue with proposed solution created by Matt following his call with Skyler
- Forum thread
-
Documentation update: Replacing “non-normative” with “informative” in the docs
- Do we have consensus regarding this change within the docs?
Forum Discussions:
Suggestions / Amendments welcome.
Thanks,
Dan